|
Committee: Employment Programs Date: April 10, 2003
Issue Summary: TANF STATE PLAN : Public comments to the TANF State Plan included concerns about sanctions and support for Pay-After-Performance as a motivational tool. There was concern that a recipient could terminate, subject to sanctions, and reapply at a later time with no sanction. It was reiterated in committee that Pay-After-Performance will be written in to policy to prevent “revolving-door” situations. State Appeals Decisions in Hardship Cases : Based upon an informal tally of Work First Hardship appeals heard by State Hearing Offices, a total of 12 cases have been heard and the following decisions were rendered: (a) 7 – In favor of the county; (b) 4 – No shows; (c) 1 – Reversal of county decision. There has been no data kept on Work First Hardship appeals. This data will be captured in the future. |
Position or Policy Recommendation for Board Action: MRA Non-Compliance Sanction Policy : After much discussion regarding sanctions and Pay-After-Performance as a policy initiative, the committee voted to recommend the following change to the Sanctions Policy of the TANF State Plan in regard to MRA Noncompliance: Delete the statement on page 27; “Second and subsequent instances of noncompliance will result in ineligibility for three months or until compliance, whichever is longer.” Change the last sentence on page 26 to; “ ANY noncompliance will result in ineligibility for one month or until compliance.” |
General Information for Dissemination:
|
To provide input or seek additional information, you may contact:
Wayne E. Black; Co-Chair
(336) 679-4210; wblack@yadkincountydss.org
Bobby Boyd; Co-Chair
(828) 695-5603; bobby@mail.co.catawba.nc.us
Attachments: (List here)